Please fill all the required fields!
The required fields are marked red.

Business partners often start a company with shared goals, trust, and a clear idea of how they want the business to grow. Problems can arise when the company becomes more valuable, financial pressures increase, personal relationships change, or the owners no longer agree on the direction of the business.
In a closely held corporation, a shareholder dispute can affect much more than ownership. It can interfere with banking, payroll, hiring, contracts, dividends, access to information, and the company's ability to make basic decisions.
This guide from Libra Law's Business Law team explains common shareholder disputes in Alberta, the steps owners can take before going to court, and some of the remedies that may be available under Alberta corporate law.
In a public company, an unhappy shareholder can often sell their shares in a liquid market. In a private corporation, that option may not exist.
Shares may be subject to transfer restrictions, there may be no obvious buyer, and the value of the shares may be disputed. At the same time, the shareholders may also be directors, officers, employees, family members, or guarantors of the company's debts.
That overlap can make a business disagreement personal very quickly.
Common disputes include:
The earlier the issue is addressed, the more options the shareholders usually have.
Before deciding what to do, review the documents that govern the relationship.
These may include:
A shareholder agreement may already contain procedures for deadlock, dispute resolution, share transfers, valuation, compulsory buyouts, or the death or incapacity of a shareholder.
If the corporation has no shareholder agreement, the owners may need to rely more heavily on the Business Corporations Act, the company's articles and bylaws, and general legal principles.
For related planning issues, see Why Your Business Needs a Shareholders' Agreement.
Many disputes become harder because the parties do not agree on basic facts such as:
Accurate corporate records can clarify these issues and help lawyers, accountants, valuators, or a court understand what happened.
If the company's records are incomplete, our guide on the Importance of Corporate Records in Alberta explains why that can create additional risk.
When a dispute escalates, shareholders sometimes react by locking each other out of email, bank accounts, offices, software, or financial records. Others stop signing cheques, cancel company credit cards, contact major customers, or move business to a competing company.
Those steps can make the dispute worse and may create new legal claims.
Before taking unilateral action, preserve relevant information and obtain advice about what authority you actually have as a shareholder, director, officer, or employee.
Useful records may include:
The goal should be to protect the company while the ownership dispute is being addressed.
Not every shareholder dispute needs litigation.
A negotiated resolution may involve:
A negotiated solution can preserve value and give the parties more control over the outcome than a court process.
However, any settlement should be documented carefully. A handshake resolution may leave the same issues unresolved later.
Some shareholder agreements require mediation or arbitration before court proceedings can begin. Even where they do not, mediation can be useful if the owners want a confidential process focused on reaching a business solution.
Arbitration may also be appropriate where the parties want a private decision-maker to resolve a defined issue, such as valuation or interpretation of a shareholder agreement.
Whether mediation or arbitration is appropriate depends on the agreement, urgency of the dispute, and the remedies being requested.
One of the most important remedies in Canadian corporate law is the oppression remedy.
Under Alberta's Business Corporations Act, a complainant may ask the court for relief where corporate conduct is oppressive, unfairly prejudicial, or unfairly disregards the interests of certain stakeholders.
In a shareholder dispute, allegations may involve conduct such as:
An oppression claim is highly fact-specific. The court will look at the parties' reasonable expectations and the actual conduct of the corporation, directors, or shareholders.
Possible court orders can be broad and may include orders regulating the corporation's affairs, requiring the purchase of shares, setting aside transactions, or granting other relief the court considers appropriate.
A shareholder dispute may involve harm done primarily to the corporation rather than directly to one shareholder.
In some circumstances, a complainant can seek permission to bring a derivative action on behalf of the corporation. This can arise where those controlling the company will not cause it to pursue a claim that may be in the corporation's interests.
The Business Corporations Act also provides mechanisms to seek orders requiring compliance with the Act, regulations, articles, bylaws, or a unanimous shareholder agreement, or restraining conduct that does not comply.
These remedies are technical and should be assessed with legal advice before proceedings are started.
In serious cases, liquidation or dissolution may become an issue.
Alberta corporate legislation allows a court to make liquidation and dissolution orders in certain circumstances, including where specified statutory grounds are met or where the court considers it just and equitable to do so.
This is generally a significant remedy because winding up the company can destroy the going-concern value the shareholders built together. For that reason, buyouts, restructuring, or other remedies are often explored first where practical.
Owning less than 50% of a corporation does not mean a shareholder has no rights.
Depending on the company's documents and the circumstances, a minority shareholder may have rights relating to:
At the same time, minority ownership does not automatically provide a veto over every business decision. The exact rights depend on the corporation's share structure, governing documents, legislation, and the nature of the decision.
A buyout is a common solution, but agreeing that someone should leave is only the beginning.
The parties still need to address:
Independent valuation and tax advice may be required in addition to legal advice.
If a disagreement is becoming serious, consider the following:
What happens if two 50/50 shareholders cannot agree?
A 50/50 ownership structure can create deadlock when the shareholders disagree on a decision requiring both of them. The first place to look is the shareholder agreement. It may contain a deadlock mechanism, buy-sell clause, mediation provision, or other process. Without one, the parties may need to negotiate a buyout, restructure management, or consider legal remedies.
Can a majority shareholder force a minority shareholder out?
Not simply because they hold a majority of the voting shares. Any proposed removal, share transfer, dilution, or compulsory purchase must comply with the corporation's governing documents and applicable law. Conduct that unfairly disregards a minority shareholder's interests may also lead to an oppression claim in appropriate circumstances.
Can I sue my business partner personally?
Potentially, depending on the claim and the person's conduct. Some claims belong against the corporation, while others may be against a director, shareholder, employee, or other individual. The correct party and remedy depend on the facts.
Is mediation required in a shareholder dispute?
Not always. It may be required by a shareholder agreement or another contract. Even when it is voluntary, mediation can be useful where the parties want a private business-focused resolution.
Can one shareholder make the other sell their shares?
Only if there is a legal basis to do so, such as an enforceable contractual buy-sell provision, a negotiated agreement, or an appropriate court order. The answer depends on the corporation's documents and the circumstances.
Shareholder disputes can threaten a company's value long before anyone files a lawsuit. The most effective response usually starts with understanding the corporation's documents, ownership structure, decision-making rules, and the legal rights of everyone involved.
Early advice can also help the parties evaluate practical solutions such as a negotiated buyout, mediation, governance changes, or a sale of the business before the dispute becomes more expensive.
Libra Law assists Alberta business owners with shareholder agreements, corporate governance, business partner disputes, and shareholder remedies.
Talk to Libra Law's Business Law team if a shareholder dispute is affecting your company.
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. To obtain advice specific to your situation, please consult a lawyer or qualified professional.